Abstract

In 2009, a novel lyssavirus (subsequently named Ikoma lyssavirus, IKOV) was detected in the brain of an African civet (Civettictis civetta) with clinical rabies in the Serengeti National Park of Tanzania. The degree of nucleotide divergence between the genome of IKOV and those of other lyssaviruses predicted antigenic distinction from, and lack of protection provided by, available rabies vaccines. In addition, the index case was considered likely to be an incidental spillover event, and therefore the true reservoir of IKOV remained to be identified. The advent of sensitive molecular techniques has led to a rapid increase in the discovery of novel viruses. Detecting viral sequence alone, however, only allows for prediction of phenotypic characteristics and not their measurement. In the present study we describe the in vitro and in vivo characterization of IKOV, demonstrating that it is (1) pathogenic by peripheral inoculation in an animal model, (2) antigenically distinct from current rabies vaccine strains and (3) poorly neutralized by sera from humans and animals immunized against rabies. In a laboratory mouse model, no protection was elicited by a licensed rabies vaccine. We also investigated the role of bats as reservoirs of IKOV. We found no evidence for infection among 483 individuals of at least 13 bat species sampled across sites in the Serengeti and Southern Kenya.

Highlights

  • The discovery of novel viruses has flourished with the advent of highly sensitive molecular detection techniques (Bexfield & Kellam, 2011; Lipkin & Firth, 2013)

  • IKOV was initially isolated through intracranial (IC) inoculation of 4-week-old CD-1 mice and stocks of virus were generated by six serial passages in murine fibroblast cells

  • We have demonstrated that peripheral pathogenicity of IKOV is comparable to that of rabies virus (RABV) in a rodent model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The discovery of novel viruses has flourished with the advent of highly sensitive molecular detection techniques (Bexfield & Kellam, 2011; Lipkin & Firth, 2013) These include metagenomic studies of the viral flora of healthy animals aimed at predicting transmission risks to other species, and the detection of pathogens in clinical samples and excreta for diagnosis (Bodewes et al, 2013; Ge et al, 2012; Li et al, 2011; Phan et al, 2011; van den Brand et al, 2012).

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.