Abstract

An ADT for the rapid diagnosis of GABHS pharyngitis that uses optical immunoassay (OIA) technology has recently been developed and marketed (Strep A OIA, BioStar Inc., Boulder, CO). It has been claimed that the OIA is more sensitive than the blood agar plate (BAP) culture and that negative OIA test results do not require confirmation with a BAP culture1. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the OIA as performed and interpreted in office practice settings with the accuracy of the BAP culture as performed and interpreted under similar conditions. Because neither the BAP culture nor the OIA test has a sensitivity or specificity of 100%, a “gold standard” had to be established against which the accuracy of each of these tests could be determined. The “gold standard” against which the sensitivity and specificity of both the BAP culture and OIA (as performed and interpreted in the office) were determined was a combination of BAP culture with serologic confirmation of GABHS and Todd-Hewitt broth (THB)-enhanced culture as performed and interpreted in either of two streptococcal research laboratories.KeywordsAntigen DetectionBlood Agar PlateLaboratory PersonnelAcute PharyngitisTransport TubeThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.