Anticoagulation in cancer patients in hospice

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

e20509 Background: Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is preferred over warfarin in patients with thromboembolic disease and active cancer, but no guidelines exist in hospice. Although warfarin may be less safe in hospice patients, hospices may prefer to provide warfarin due to lower cost and less invasiveness compared to LMWHs. We sought to identify disparities in the use of warfarin vs. LMWHs in cancer patients enrolled in hospice. Methods: We analyzed a dataset from a national pharmacy provider for more than 800 hospices. We identified patients with a terminal diagnosis of cancer who were enrolled and died in hospice in 2006 and who were prescribed warfarin or LMWH. Patient characteristics included age, gender, race, cancer diagnosis, length of hospice service, and number of comorbidities. For descriptive comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables, and the Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Results: Of 54,764 patients with cancer admitted and deceased in 2006, 3874 (7.1%) were prescribed warfarin, and 1137 (2.1%) were prescribed LMWH. Patients prescribed warfarin (n=576) or enoxaparin (n=5) for treatment of atrial arrhythmias were excluded. The mean age was 70.6 years for warfarin and 64.8 years for LMWH (p<0.0001). The mean and median lengths of service, respectively, were 43.6 days and 23.0 days for warfarin and 35.0 and 18.0 days for LMWH, (p<0.0001). There were no differences for gender, and a higher proportion of white patients were prescribed warfarin. Patients prescribed warfarin had an average of 2.1 comorbid conditions, versus 1.6 conditions for LMWH (p<0.0001). Cancer diagnoses were significantly different between the two groups, with a higher proportion of patients with lung and prostate cancer taking warfarin. Conclusions: Patients prescribed warfarin were older, had more comorbidities, and a longer length of service than patients prescribed LMWHs. Further research is needed to determine the impact of anticoagulation on outcomes, especially cost and quality of life, for cancer patients in hospice. This study raises the need to establish guidelines for the appropriateness of anticoagulation in hospice patients with cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.