Abstract

People regularly make decisions about how often and with whom to interact. During an epidemic of communicable disease, these decisions gain new weight, as individual choices exert more direct influence on collective health and wellbeing. While much attention has been paid to how people’s concerns about the health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic affect their engagement in behaviors that could curb (or accelerate) the spread of the disease, less is understood about how people’s concerns about the pandemic’s impact on their social lives affect these outcomes. Across three studies (total N = 654), we find that individuals’ estimates of the pandemic’s social (vs. health) impact are associated with an unwillingness to curtail social interaction and follow other Centers for Disease Control guidelines as the pandemic spreads. First, these associations are present in self-report data of participants’ own behaviors and behavior across hypothetical scenarios; second, participants’ estimates of the pandemic’s impact on social life in their location of residence are associated with movement data collected unobtrusively from mobile phones in those locations. We suggest that perceptions of social impact could be a potential mechanism underlying, and therefore potential intervention target for addressing, disease-preventing behavior during a pandemic.

Highlights

  • People often face tradeoffs between their own immediate interests and the collective interests of a group

  • There was a main effect of domain, such that the anticipated health impact (M = 4.973) was rated as more severe than the anticipated social impact (M = 4.398; b = –0.566, SE = 0.108, X2(1) = 28.222, p < 0.001, 95% CI [–0.778, –0.354])

  • There was an interaction between domain and time frame (b = 0.228, SE = 0.115, X2(1) = 4.028, p = 0.045, 95% CI [0.003, 0.453]); participants perceived a greater difference between the severity of health and social impacts within 3 months as compared to 1 year in the future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People often face tradeoffs between their own immediate interests and the collective interests of a group. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared a global pandemic as a result of the worldwide spread of a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which causes the respiratory disease COVID-19. The declaration of a pandemic brought with it a collection of guidelines aimed at curtailing the spread of the disease and that imposed limitations on people’s activities in daily life. These guidelines were met with widely varying levels of compliance across individuals (Marcus, 2020; Wiest, 2020), in turn affecting the spread of the disease. It is estimated that adhering to one specific type of guideline—strict reduction in one’s direct interactions with others (i.e., “social distancing”)—could have saved tens of thousands of lives in the 1st year of the pandemic (IHME Covid-19 Forecasting Team, 2021).

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call