Abstract

e18699 Background: DIILD accounts for 3-5% of all ILD cases, with Anticancer agents accounting for 23-51% of all cases, and Case-Fatality Rates of 51.3%. Guidelines for anticancer therapy-related DIILD are lacking. DIILD was not often identified as an adverse event until late in drug development or after launch. Methods: Publications till Feb 2023 were reviewed for incidence, time to onset, prevention and early identification of anticancer DIILD. Results: Highest reportedincidence of DIILD was associated with targeted therapies [mTOR Inhibitors (9.5- 58%), Anti-EGFR (0.9 - 5.9%), MEK inhibitors (2.4%), CDK 4/6 inhibitors (1.6%), PARP inhibitors (0.79%)]; Chemotherapy [Bleomycin (6.8-21%), Gemcitabine(1.1-3.9%), Irinotecan (0.74%)]; ADCs (11.4%); CTLA4 inhibitors (5.44%); and Check-point inhibitors [(CPIs: 1.1-3.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (3.6%), PD-L1 inhibitors (1.3%)]. The rates of DIILD were higher in combinations compared to single-agents. Higher Mortality rates were associated with Anti-EGFR (18-51.3%), Irinotecan (24%), Bleomycin (8.1-23%), Gemcitabine (0-22%), mTOR Inhibitors (0-20%), Check-point inhibitors (all CPIs: 8-9.4%). The time of onset was as early as a week for CPIs (42% occurred within first two months), 28 days for EGFR:TKIs, 60-172 days for MEK Inhibitors, and 14-638 days for ADCs. Risk-mitigation strategies for DIILD: Identification of high-risk patients – (multiple prior lines of therapy, combination therapy, lung comorbidities, poor respiratory reserve, smokers). Early radiological diagnosis accompanied by Monitoringfor early signs of ILD with wearable technology. Conclusions: Research in Genomics and biomarkers to identify patients at risk, development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms for PFT interpretation, early radiological detection and audiometry analysis are ongoing and urgently needed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call