Abstract

Influenza virus infection elicits antibodies against the receptor-binding protein hemagglutinin (HA) and the receptor-cleaving protein neuraminidase (NA). Because HA is essential for viral entry, antibodies targeting HA often potently neutralize the virus in single-cycle infection assays. However, antibodies against NA are not potently neutralizing in such assays, since NA is dispensable for single-cycle infection. Here we show that a modified influenza virus that depends on NA for receptor binding is much more sensitive than a virus with receptor-binding HA to neutralization by some anti-NA antibodies. Specifically, a virus with a receptor-binding G147R N1 NA and a binding-deficient HA is completely neutralized in single-cycle infections by an antibody that binds near the NA active site. Infection is also substantially inhibited by antibodies that bind NA epitopes distant from the active site. Finally, we demonstrate that this modified virus can be used to efficiently select mutations in NA that escape antibody binding, a task that can be laborious with typical influenza viruses that are not well neutralized by anti-NA antibodies. Thus, viruses dependent on NA for receptor binding allow for sensitive in vitro detection of antibodies binding near the catalytic site of NA and enable the selection of viral escape mutants.

Highlights

  • Neuraminidase (NA) and hemagglutinin (HA) are the two major proteins on the surface of influenza virions, and play opposing roles during the viral life cycle

  • We have shown that engineered influenza viruses that use NA for receptor-binding are potently neutralized by some antibodies

  • Antibodies only becomes strongly neutralized by some anti-NA antibodies. This contrasts with the typical situation for viruses that bind apparent after multicycle growth [4,41]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuraminidase (NA) and hemagglutinin (HA) are the two major proteins on the surface of influenza virions, and play opposing roles during the viral life cycle. HA mediates viral attachment and entry into cells, while NA cleaves sialic-acid receptors to release newly formed virions and prevent their aggregation [1]. Because only HA is needed for viral entry, anti-NA antibodies are not strongly neutralizing in infection assays where viruses are only allowed to undergo a single cycle of growth [4,5]. Several exceptions to the classic role of NA as a receptor-cleaving but not a receptor-binding protein have been uncovered. It was soon discovered that the mutations D151G/N allow N2 NA to bind sialic-acid receptors, but ablate NA

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call