Abstract
BackgroundAntibody isotype responses can be useful as indicators of immune bias during infection. In studies of parasite co-infection however, interpretation of immune bias is complicated by the occurrence of cross-reactive antibodies. To confidently attribute shifts in immune bias to the presence of a co-infecting parasite, we suggest practical approaches to account for antibody cross-reactivity. The potential for cross-reactive antibodies to influence disease outcome is also discussed.ResultsUtilising two murine models of malaria-helminth co-infection we analysed antibody responses of mice singly- or co-infected with Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi and Nippostrongylus brasiliensis or Litomosoides sigmodontis. We observed cross-reactive antibody responses that recognised antigens from both pathogens irrespective of whether crude parasite antigen preparations or purified recombinant proteins were used in ELISA. These responses were not apparent in control mice. The relative strength of cross-reactive versus antigen-specific responses was determined by calculating antibody titre. In addition, we analysed antibody binding to periodate-treated antigens, to distinguish responses targeted to protein versus carbohydrate moieties. Periodate treatment affected both antigen-specific and cross-reactive responses. For example, malaria-induced cross-reactive IgG1 responses were found to target the carbohydrate component of the helminth antigen, as they were not detected following periodate treatment. Interestingly, periodate treatment of recombinant malaria antigen Merozoite Surface Protein-119 (MSP-119) resulted in increased detection of antigen-specific IgG2a responses in malaria-infected mice. This suggests that glycosylation may have been masking protein epitopes and that periodate-treated MSP-119 may more closely reflect the natural non-glycosylated antigen seen during infection.ConclusionsIn order to utilize antibody isotypes as a measure of immune bias during co-infection studies, it is important to dissect antigen-specific from cross-reactive antibody responses. Calculating antibody titre, rather than using a single dilution of serum, as a measure of the relative strength of the response, largely accomplished this. Elimination of the carbohydrate moiety of an antigen that can often be the target of cross-reactive antibodies also proved useful.
Highlights
Antibody isotype responses can be useful as indicators of immune bias during infection
We envisaged that analysis of the antibody isotype response from these mice would provide a method to rapidly and quantitatively assess immune bias
We asked whether we could use antibody isotype ELISA for IgG2a and IgG1 to address whether nematode infection would skew the Th1 cell response to Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi (Pcc) to a more Th2 cell biased response
Summary
Antibody isotype responses can be useful as indicators of immune bias during infection. In studies of parasite co-infection interpretation of immune bias is complicated by the occurrence of cross-reactive antibodies. The geographical and socio-economic distribution of malaria overlaps with areas in which a number of helminth parasites are endemic It is the norm in these areas for co-infection to occur and a growing body of literature reflects this [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. We found that co-infected mice (Pcc-Ls), those that did not have blood microfilaremia, had exacerbated immunopathology This was associated with increased interferon-gamma (IFN-g) responsiveness but was independent of Pcc parasitemia [21]. One of the primary objectives in our previous malaria-nematode co-infection studies was to gather antigen-specific T-cell data to determine whether nematode infection could alter the cytokine bias of the Pcc-specific T lymphocyte response towards Th1 and whether a potent Th1 response could alter the Th2 bias of the nematode-specific response
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.