Abstract
Protein-based subunit smallpox vaccines have shown their potential as effective alternatives to live virus vaccines in animal model challenge studies. We vaccinated mice with combinations of three different vaccinia virus (VACV) proteins (A33, B5, L1) and examined how the combined antibody responses to these proteins cooperate to effectively neutralize the extracellular virus (EV) infectious form of VACV. Antibodies against these targets were generated in the presence or absence of CpG adjuvant so that Th1-biased antibody responses could be compared to Th2-biased responses to the proteins with aluminum hydroxide alone, specifically with interest in looking at the ability of anti-B5 and anti-A33 polyclonal antibodies (pAb) to utilize complement-mediated neutralization in vitro. We found that neutralization of EV by anti-A33 or anti-B5 pAb can be enhanced in the presence of complement if Th1-biased antibody (IgG2a) is generated. Mechanistic differences found for complement-mediated neutralization showed that anti-A33 antibodies likely result in virolysis, while anti-B5 antibodies with complement can neutralize by opsonization (coating). In vivo studies found that mice lacking the C3 protein of complement were less protected than wild-type mice after passive transfer of anti-B5 pAb or vaccination with B5. Passive transfer of anti-B5 pAb or monoclonal antibody into mice lacking Fc receptors (FcRs) found that FcRs were also important in mediating protection. These results demonstrate that both complement and FcRs are important effector mechanisms for antibody-mediated protection from VACV challenge in mice.
Highlights
In the 1970s, the World Health Organization led a successful campaign to eradicate smallpox using live vaccinia virus (VACV) vaccines [1]
We have previously shown that vaccinating mice and nonhuman primates with a combination of VACV proteins and CpG and aluminum hydroxide protects from a lethal poxvirus infection [32,34]
Vaccine induced antibodies have been shown to be critical for protection from orthopoxvirus challenge [14,60,61,62]
Summary
In the 1970s, the World Health Organization led a successful campaign to eradicate smallpox using live vaccinia virus (VACV) vaccines [1]. Recent concern over the intentional or accidental release of variola virus has led some of the world’s nations to stockpile live VACV vaccines [2,3,4]. With the risk of variola virus release minimal, concerns regarding live VACV vaccine’s rare but serious side effects and many contraindications [5,6,7] have led to the pursuit of safer smallpox vaccine strategies [8,9,10]. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), a highly attenuated VACV-derived vaccine, has been under development and will likely soon become a safer alternative [11,12]. We evaluated the efficacy and mechanism by which a protein-based subunit vaccine can protect against orthopoxvirus infection
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.