Antibiotic Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infection Inhibits the Development of Protective Immunity.

Abstract

Recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections are common, suggesting a failure to elicit protective immunity. Given the emergence of antibiotic resistance, a vaccine is urgently needed, but there is no approved vaccine for S. aureus. While antibiotics are routinely used to treat S. aureus infections, their impact on the development of protective immunity is not understood. Using an established mouse model of S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), we observed that antibiotic therapy effectively resolved infection but failed to elicit protection against secondary (2°) SSTI. Key contributors to protective immunity, toxin-specific antibodies and interleukin-17A (IL-17A)-producing T cells, were not strongly elicited in antibiotic-treated mice. Delaying antibiotic treatment failed to resolve skin lesions but resulted in higher antibody levels after infection and strong protection against 2° SSTI, suggesting that the development of protective immunity requires a longer period of antigen exposure. We next investigated if combining α-hemolysin (Hla) vaccination with antibiotics during primary infection would both treat infection and generate durable protective immunity. This "therapeutic vaccination" approach resulted in rapid resolution of primary infection and protection against recurrent infection, demonstrating that concurrent vaccination could circumvent the deleterious effects of antibiotic therapy on elicited immune responses. Collectively, these findings suggest that protective immunity is thwarted by the rapid elimination of antigen during antibiotic treatment. However, vaccination in conjunction with antibiotic treatment can retain the benefits of antibiotic treatment while also establishing protective immunity.