Abstract

Several antiseptic agents have been proposed for the treatment of peri-implantitis as a complementary therapeutic strategy in addition to mechanical devices. The aim of this study was to compare six different antiseptics, as well as alternative formulations of the same chemical agent, with respect to their decontamination efficacy and impact on chemical properties of the implant surface. Titanium disks with a micro-rough surface, previously contaminated with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans biofilms, were treated for 2 min with different antiseptics (liquid sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, gel sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, liquid chlorhexidine 0.2%, gel chlorhexidine 1%, gel citric acid 40%, and gel orthophosphoric acid 37%) or sterile saline solution (control) and their antibacterial activity as well as their ability to remove biofilm were assessed by viable bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Spectroscopic analysis was also performed on non-contaminated disks after exposure to the antiseptics, in order to detect any change in the elemental composition of the titanium surface. All the antimicrobial formulations examined were effective against P. gingivalis and S. mutans biofilms. SEM analysis revealed however that liquid sodium hypochlorite 5.25% was more effective in dissolving biofilm residues. Spectroscopic analysis detected traces of the antiseptics, probably due to insufficient rinsing of the titanium surfaces. In conclusion, since gel formulations of these antiseptic agents possessed a similar antibacterial activity to the liquid formulations, these may be proposed as alternative treatments given their properties to avoid overflows and increase contact time without significant side effects on the bone.

Highlights

  • Implant failure due to biological complications, such as peri-implantitis, represents a major concern in implant rehabilitation

  • Sci. 2019, 9, 5467 gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans, contribute to its development and progression. Both microorganisms are responsible for oral diseases and, in particular, P. gingivalis is recognized as most closely linked to the development of peri-implantitis while S. mutans is known to favor the development of a biofilm coating on titanium surfaces [4]

  • The antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis and S. mutans biofilms formed on human saliva-coated titanium surfaces was investigated via the total bacteria count and expressed as reduction factor (RF)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implant failure due to biological complications, such as peri-implantitis, represents a major concern in implant rehabilitation. Sci. 2019, 9, 5467 gingivalis and Streptococcus mutans, contribute to its development and progression Both microorganisms are responsible for oral diseases and, in particular, P. gingivalis is recognized as most closely linked to the development of peri-implantitis while S. mutans is known to favor the development of a biofilm coating on titanium surfaces [4]. On this matter, Mombelli and Lang [5] provided at least five lines of evidence to support the bacterial etiology of peri-implantitis, findings confirmed by the World Workshop for the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call