Abstract

Traditional mindset in anti-medical violence legislation tends to divert the responsibility to prevent medical violence to the party of the lowest costs, a design of obvious loopholes in reducing medical violence occurrence. By combining the legal liability and penalty adjustment to counter medical violence crimes, the US, Australia and South Korea are trying to match the private cost of victims and its social cost with the punishment of crime law. In this sense, China should highlight the nature of public safety of medical service, zero tolerance report and optimal punishment to medical violence crimes. This approach can take place of the existing incentive mechanism featuring violent conflicts, being conducive to building a safe and harmonious doctor-patient relationship. Key words: Safety management; Medical violence; Legal liability; Penalty intensity; International experience

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call