Abstract
The strength of the relationship between several anthropometric indicators of nutritional status, or more generally, standard of living, with overall mortality at the population level is compared. The anthropometic indicators examined include height, weight, weight-for-height, and weight-for-height2 at various ages. The results demonstrate that height is most closely associated with the level of mortality. Weight-for height2 , in contrast, has the weakest association with mortality. Of the ages examined, age 6 consistently has the strongest relationship with the level of mortality, whereas birthweight and adult measures have the lowest associations with the overall level of mortality, although the results for birthweight may be an artifact of biased data. Curiously, there is little or no sex difference in the slope of the relationship between anthropometric measure and level of mortality after correcting for smaller size and longer life expectancies of females compared to males. Overall, the anthropometric indicators are very highly correlated with mortality, exceeding 0.85 in some cases. This suggests that anthropometric dimensions may be a useful source of corroborative information when attempting to estimate demographic rates for populations where the demographic data are suspect. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.