Abstract

The oro-facial morphology is greatly affected in neonates with a cleft lip and palate. The initial evaluation of neonate’s body and maxillary arch dimensions is important for treatment planning and predicting growth in cleft patients. The objective of this study was comparative evaluation of the anthropometric and physiologic parameters of cleft and non-cleft neonates in a hospital-based set up. This cross sectional study was conducted on 88 cleft and non-cleft neonates (n = 44 in each group) aged between 0 and 30 days after obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee and positive written informed consent from their parents. Neonates’ body weight, body length, head length, head circumference, and maxillary arch dimensions were measured. Maxillary arch dimensions were measured on dental casts with digital sliding calipers. Statistical analyses performed using the independent t-test and one-way ANOVA analysis were followed by Bonferroni correction for post-hoc comparison. The results showed statistically significant differences in birth weight (p < 0.0001), head length (p < 0.01), head circumference (p < 0.007), and maxillary arch dimensions (p < 0.0001) between cleft and non-cleft neonates. These findings suggest that cleft neonates had significant anthropometric and physiologic variations than non-cleft neonates.

Highlights

  • The cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial abnormality in neonates

  • [1] In India, neonates born with craniofacial anomalies comprise about 1.10 per 1000 live births [2]

  • This cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted among 88 neonates, 44 with a cleft Lip and/or palate and 44 without, aged between

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial abnormality in neonates. The incidence of CL/P is 1.7 per 1000 live births with ethnic and geographical variation worldwide [1] In India, neonates born with craniofacial anomalies comprise about 1.10 per 1000 live births [2]. Mossey et al reported the incidence of 0.93 per 1000 live births [3]. In south India, reported the incidence of 1.09 per 1000 live births [4]. The CL/P has a multifactorial etiology that includes both genetic and environmental factors. These environmental risk factors include exposure to tobacco, alcohol, inadequate nutrition intake, infections, and teratogens during 6th to 13th week of intrauterine life [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call