Abstract

The article is concerned with the anthropology of a city. As an instrument of conceptualization, we used a three-dimensional scheme: organization — communication — information, which allows giving the urban interpre-tation for each of the coordinates, and then, using the two-dimensional projections (organization-information, or-ganization-communication, information-communication), to develop a concept of the three-dimensional image of city. It has been proposed to distinguish three types of organizational structures when considering the city as an organization: hierarchical, algorithmic, and relational. The necessity of curbing the growth of the city and solidat-ing it in the context of communication has produced a number of projections. One of them, "A compact city or city of short distances" has been considered. The concept of a compact city is based on the cost-effective public transport system, and it encourages pedestrian traffic and cycling. When considering the city as an organization, the main focus lies on its structure. From a topological point of view, it has been proposed to distinguish between three types of such structures: hierarchical, algorithmic, and relational. A hierarchical structure represents a tree of power hierarchy, but its content is not necessarily associated with consistent delegation of authority power (from top to bottom) or gradual accumulation of information (from the bottom up). Thus, a library catalogue, as well as other classification means, is arranged on the principle of hierarchy. An algorithmic structure is a scheme of production process which consists of a set of sequential operations. Its mathematical model appears as a net-work diagram. Typical examples of such structures include an algorithm of construction of a building, from founda-tion to roof, a conveyed assembly of complex technical devices, etc. In relation to a city, this structure can be filled with different content. Thus, carrying out of repair and maintenance in one of the city networks often requires not only formal coordination, but also a network schedule of joint work with other community services (water, electric-ity grid, heating, communication lines, etc.). A relational structure is a group of objects of arbitrary nature, usually of the same type, singled out from the total quantity of objects on the basis of any common feature. A complex of educational or medical institutions, trade companies, domestic services, etc. could be an example of such group within the organizational structure of a city.

Highlights

  • Введение В последнее время проблематика антропологии города в отечественном социальногуманитарном знании заметно актуализировалась

  • В теоретической части в качестве инструмента концептуализации предложена трехмерная схема: организация — коммуникация — информация, позволяющая вначале дать городскую интерпретацию каждой из трех координатных осей, а затем с помощью парных проекций сформировать представление о трехмерном образе города

  • It has been proposed to distinguish three types of organizational structures when considering the city as an organization: hierarchical, algorithmic, and relational

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Введение В последнее время проблематика антропологии города в отечественном социальногуманитарном знании заметно актуализировалась. В теоретической части в качестве инструмента концептуализации предложена трехмерная схема: организация — коммуникация — информация, позволяющая вначале дать городскую интерпретацию каждой из трех координатных осей, а затем с помощью парных (двумерных) проекций сформировать представление о трехмерном (объемном) образе города. Введенный в научный оборот маркизом де Мирабо, как известно, был образован от слова civilis ― гражданский, государственный (лат.) Впоследствии термин неоднократно менял содержание и объем: от глобального, соотносимого с общественно-экономическими формациями, до локального (например, горнозаводская цивилизация Урала), но при этом его «городская» сущность сохранялась. Одним из способов последовательного приближения к пониманию феномена организации может служить гносеологическая цепочка: орган или орган (инструмент) ― органон (комплект инструментов) ― организация ― организм (еще наличествует структура) ― органика (отсутствие структуры).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call