Abstract
Relevance of the article. The article is devoted to defining the role of anthropological, semiological and visual turns in the system of interpretation of artistic syntheses as a phenomenon of cultural creativity. The anthropological turn in the philosophical reflection of the twentieth century is associated both with the change of the human image, ontological, phenomenological, mass media transformations of the reproduction of human integrity in culture, and with the emergence of philosophical anthropology. The semiological turn was marked by a boom in structuralist research, and the visual one by the emergence of a new visual metalanguage in the modern media space, in particular in advertising, design, and pop synthesis. The purpose of the article is to determine the cultural dimensions of philosophical reflection in the context of these turns. The modern media construct, like any moderators, mediators, modern protagonists who become intermediaries between "Me" and "You", makes it possible to say that culture is increasingly based on these intermediaries. The research methodology is determined by systematic and comparative approaches, which makes it possible to determine the integrity of cultural creation in the context of intercultural dialogue. As a protagonist in ancient Greece, mediocre communication becomes a mediator, it becomes necessary to mark any system of identification, to mark the manifestation of identity as a certain reflexive or areflexive, immanent or universal reality of communication, that is - everything we define as symbiosis, culturogenesis, synthesis, dialogue of cultures. Novelty of the article. S. Diaghilev's act as a phenomenon of seasons, synthesis of arts in the context of stage space is first of all a phenomenon of personal miracle, phenomenon of personality, human integrity, which arises in such unexpected opera enterprises, which are destructured, miraculously dancers. Conclusion. Dance as the most important choreic principle of cultural creation becomes the dominant principle of cultural creation of all artistic syntheses, which are carried out in the stage space at the beginning of the XXth century.
Highlights
The article is devoted to defining the role
Образ людини як образ цілісності, людиновимірності культури свідчить про те, що займенники у дискурсі, які замінюють персону, особистість, цілісність суб’єкта, актора, актанта, продуцента, діяча як носія потенціалу культурно-історичної цілісності доби несуть в собі спонуки продукування, спонуки комунікації, зустрічі з будь-яким іншим, з іншим «Я», Абсолютом, з іншою культурою, з потенційно можливим іншим, який збагачує, збільшує, розкриває комунікативне поле як потенціал культуротворення у вимірі його універсальності, цілісності і самодостатності
Summary
АНТРОПОЛОГІЧНИЙ, СЕМІОЛОГІЧНИЙ ТА ВІЗУАЛЬНИЙ ПОВОРОТИ ЯК ІНТЕРПРЕТАНТА КУЛЬТУРОГЕНЕЗУ МИСТЕЦЬКОГО СИНТЕЗУ Ключові слова: культура, антропологічний, семіологічний, візуальний повороти, системогенез культури, синтез мистецтв Все це дає своєрідний хід тим інтенціям та інтуїціям, які існують як певний орнамент, Антропологічний, семіологічний та візуальний повороти як інтерпретанта культурогенезу мистецького синтезу 11
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.