Abstract
Even in socially monogamous species, sexual conflict is one reason that often promotes differences in the roles of sexes during reproduction, which may lead to one sex making a disproportionate contribution, and thus incurring disproportionate costs, at particular moments of the breeding process. In Mexico City, a number of songbird species line their nests with fibers from discarded cigarette butts, which reduce ectoparasite load but are genotoxic. As male Passer domesticus make substantial contributions to nest building whereas male Carpodacus mexicanus do not contribute to nest building, we hypothesized that the toxic effects of exposure to cigarette butts should be greater for females C. mexicanus than for conspecific males, but that there should be little or no difference in P. domesticus. As expected there was more exogenous genotoxic damage in the red-blood cells of incubating female C. mexicanus the more cigarette butts were found in their nest, and much more than in their conspecific males. Damage in males was not associated to cigarette butts; it was initially lower than in females, but it increased near fledging, together with their breeding effort. In both male and female P. domesticus, however, genotoxic damage was equally apparent and greater the more cigarette butts were in the nest. The novel use of a toxic, anthropogenic parasite repellent by urban birds may be thus asymmetrically increasing the breeding costs paid by the member of the pair most involved in nest building and incubation.
Highlights
Human activities impact the environment in a variety of ways, often with negative consequences for the local biota (Miller and Hobbs, 2002)
We found fluctuating levels of genotoxic damage –measured as the number of red-blood cells with nuclear abnormalitiesin breeding P. domesticus and C. mexicanus of both sexes
At least during the early stages of the breeding attempt such damage can be expressed as a function of the amount cigarette butts that they use to build their nest, and reveals a novel breeding cost for birds nesting in cities
Summary
Human activities impact the environment in a variety of ways, often with negative consequences for the local biota (Miller and Hobbs, 2002) This is clearly the case with urbanization, where organisms are exposed to a new array of stressors that impose substantial constraints on their biology (Ditchkoff et al, 2006). Behavioral modifications are amongst the first responses of animals to life in the cities (Baldwin, 1896; Price et al, 2003) This is because behavior can be speedily adjusted through learning, providing a rapid means to adapt to new conditions (Ditchkoff et al, 2006; Sih et al, 2011; Sih, 2013). Other examples include short-term increases in competitive behavior of invasive crabs (Tanner et al, 2011) and changes of time budgets in birds near airports (Gil et al, 2014)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.