Abstract
<p class="p1">Through a close reading of McKenzie Wark’s theoretical treatise <em>Molecular Red</em> (2015) and Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel <em>Aurora</em> (2015), this essay examines how Anthropocene knowledge practices challenge our conceptions of human agency in provocative and potentially productive ways. For example, our knowledge of climate science arises through global material infrastructures. As material components of Anthropocene knowledge practices, these infrastructures reveal the material labors and cyborg structures by means of which our knowledge is produced. Wark sees the heterogenous materiality of Anthropocene knowledge practices as evidence for the value of ‘low theories’ based on a ‘labor point of view.’ At the same time, Anthropocene knowledge practices reveal ‘eco-logical’ complexities and fundamental recognitions of the ‘intra-action’ of entangled matter. These complexities produce very estranged views of human agency. Robinson’s novel highlights the eco-logical implications of contemporary knowledge practices by imagining an interstellar ship that must function as a completely artificial ecosystem for a 170-year voyage to another solar system. The significance of knowledge practices and eco-logical complexity is most evident when failures or crises arise, and <em>Aurora</em> tells the story of many such failures. However, I argue that Robinson’s novel and Wark’s ‘low theory’ ultimately function as hopeful accounts of Anthropocene knowledge practices. Among other things, these practices show the material importance of storytelling and point the way toward more complexly realist theories of human agency.
Highlights
Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service
Wark sees the heterogenous materiality of Anthropocene knowledge practices as evidence for the value of ‘low theories’ based on a ‘labor point of view.’
An Anthropocene age signifies that humans have the power to transform the Prettyman: Anthropocene Knowledge Practices in McKenzie Wark’s
Summary
Through a close reading of McKenzie Wark’s theoretical treatise Molecular Red (2015) and Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel Aurora (2015), this essay examines how Anthropocene knowledge practices challenge our c onceptions of human agency in provocative and potentially productive ways. The texts share intellectual DNA: Wark’s treatise includes a chapter on Robinson’s Mars trilogy and an endorsing blurb from Robinson on the back cover, while Robinson’s novel uses concepts from Molecular Red and mentions Wark in the acknowledgments Both texts delve self-consciously into issues raised by Anthropocene knowledge practices and suggest potential ways to re-situate human agency. Eco-logical conceptions stand as realistic and hopeful political alternatives to the threatening path of fundamentalisms, whereby people choose to reject knowledge frameworks beyond the traditional human scale (both microscopic and macroscopic) in favor of familiar and comforting cognitive practices Understood this way, the stories we tell ourselves about the Anthropocene are themselves crucial knowledge practices
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
