Abstract

This article problematizes the interactions between philosophy and science, based on the thesis of the naturalist idealism by Antero de Quental. This thesis is built on the criticisms of the philosophy of positive nature. This question is dominant in Antero de Quental’s work A filosofia da natureza dos naturalistas [The naturalists’ philosophy of nature], which proposes an idealism within naturalism, as a synthetic and systematic overcoming of the radical antinomy materialism versus idealism. This article questions: a) the monist theses and the different expressions of naturalism (positivism, materialism, scientism, etc.), and b) Antero de Quental’s evolutionary, metaphysical and positive unifying perspective as a way to overcome the materialism versus idealism antinomy. It demonstrates the complexity of the philosophical treatment of this question and the importance for science of a demarcation on metaphysical speculation, in a fertile epoch for Auguste Comte and Littre’s positivism, the evolutionism of Herbert Spencer, the naturalist monism of Ernst Haeckel and materialist scientism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.