Abstract

Surgical treatment may be indicated for select patients with cervical disc disease, whether it is cervical disc herniation or spondylosis due to degenerative changes, acute cervical injury due to trauma, or other underlying cervical pathology. Currently, there are various surgical techniques, including anterior, posterior, or combined approaches, in addition to new interventions being utilized in practice. Ideally, the surgical approach should be selected in consideration of each patient’s clinical presentation, imaging findings, and overall medical comorbidities on an individual basis. But the unique advantages and disadvantages of each surgical technique often complicate the therapy choice in managing cervical disc diseases. Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most widely accepted procedure performed for both single and multi-level cervical disc diseases, there are multiple modifications to this technique. Surgeons have access to different types of plates, screws, and cages and can adopt newer advances in the field such as stand-alone and minimally invasive techniques when indicated. In short, no consensus exists in terms of a single approach that is preferred for all patients. This article aims to review the standard of care for management of cervical disc disease with a focus on the surgical techniques and, in particular, the anterior approach, exploring the various surgical options within this technique.

Highlights

  • BackgroundFor patients with cervical disc disease, most of which are due to cervical disc degeneration from natural aging, conservative treatment is still regarded as the first-line therapy

  • Surgical treatment may be indicated for select patients with cervical disc disease, whether it is cervical disc herniation or spondylosis due to degenerative changes, acute cervical injury due to trauma, or other underlying cervical pathology

  • Conservative treatment alone can be effective for many patients, surgery is indicated for those unresponsive to medical approaches or those with evidence of myelopathy with or without neurologic deficit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For patients with cervical disc disease, most of which are due to cervical disc degeneration from natural aging, conservative treatment is still regarded as the first-line therapy. After reviewing 10 studies consisting of over 700 patients in their meta-analysis, Dong et al concluded that zero-profile spacers conferred similar fusion rates, lower Neck Disability Index (NDI), and improved pain scores compared to standard anterior plating [28] These favorable outcomes were replicated in both single level and multi-level cervical disc diseases, suggesting the safety of zero-profile spacers regardless of number of cervical levels involved [40, 41]. Cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy (CMEF/D), cervical microendoscopic decompression of stenosis (CMEDS), and full endoscopic cervical discectomy (FECD) are some of the different methods that surgeons can employ to replace traditional discectomy [43] These techniques are fairly new, a review of studies to date suggests that endoscopic procedures produce clinical outcomes comparable to traditional discectomy surgeries while lowering complication rates, patient discomfort, and hospitalization time.

Conclusions
Disclosures
Findings
15. Bose B
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call