Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Demonstrates No Difference In Outcomes, But Faster Functional Recovery, Versus Non-augmented ACL Reconstruction

Abstract

PurposeTo compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) vs. ACLR without biologic augmentation or STA. MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution was performed to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (Group A) vs. ACLR without biologic or STA (Group NA). One hundred patients were required. Skeletally mature patients <25 years old received quadriceps tendon autografts, while patients ≥25 years old received allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. Primary outcomes compared were range-of-motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analysis were used to compare outcomes. ResultsFifty-nine patients were included (Group A: 29 patients, 11 females, 38%; Group NA: 30 patients, 15 females, 50%). Early range-of-motion at 6 weeks (125° vs 109° flexion, p<0.0001) and limb symmetry testing at 12 weeks (80.6 % vs. 36.7% [Delta 43.9%], p<0.001) were significantly improved in Group A. At two years, International Knee Documentation (IKDC) scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs. 85.3 ± 10.8, p=0.109). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QOL) scores were significantly enhanced in Group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs. 72.1 ± 20.4, p=0.042). Twenty-two patients (12 Group A, 10 Group NA) underwent CT scans at 6-months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in Group A vs. NA. No difference in graft re-ruptures or re-operations was observed. Seven of 59 patients (11.9%) underwent re-operation for stiffness (A: 3 (10%) vs. NA: 4 (13%), p=1.0). ConclusionThere were no differences in IKDC scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early range-of-motion and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA. ACLRACLR.ACLR