Abstract

Background context: Tricortical autogenous iliac crest has long served as the gold standard for arthrodesis after cervical discectomy. The added morbidity resulting from bone graft harvest may be eliminated by the use of a biocompatible synthetic bone graft substitute with osteoconductive abilities, and when used with an osteoinductive agent, such as recombinant bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP)–2, it may facilitate arthrodesis similar to autograft. Purpose: To determine by radiographic and histologic analysis whether tantalum with and without rhBMP-2 can facilitate bony ingrowth and arthrodesis in an animal model. Study design/setting: Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed using a tantalum bone graft substitute with and without rhBMP-2 in a previously established goat model for anterior cervical fusion. Methods: Eight goats underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and stabilization with a porous tantalum implant. There were four goats in each experimental group. Group A underwent anterior cervical stabilization with tantalum alone, whereas in Group B rhBMP-2 was added to the tantalum implant. The goats were sacrificed at 12 weeks, and their cervical spines were removed for histologic and radiological analysis. Results: Only one of four goats in Group A had any bony ingrowth into the tantalum. Three of four goats in Group B demonstrated bony ingrowth. The average extent of bony ingrowth at the perimeter of the tantalum in Group A was 2.5% compared with 12.5% in Group B. Similarly, the volume of bony ingrowth within the tantalum was 2.5% in Group A and 10% in Group B. The difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The data in this pilot study suggest that tantalum may function as a synthetic osteoconductive bone graft substitute. The addition of rhBMP-2 may facilitate osteoinduction within a synthetic osteoconductive implant. The sample size in this study was too small for statistical significance. The present animal model as used in this study was inadequate for cervical arthrodesis where rigid implant fixation is desired.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.