Abstract

Abstract. The relationship between antecedent flow conditions and nitrate concentrations was explored at eight sites in the 2.9 million square kilometers (km2) Mississippi River basin, USA. Antecedent flow conditions were quantified as the ratio between the mean daily flow of the previous year and the mean daily flow from the period of record (Qratio), and the Qratio was statistically related to nitrate anomalies (the unexplained variability in nitrate concentration after filtering out season, long-term trend, and contemporaneous flow effects) at each site. Nitrate anomaly and Qratio were negatively related at three of the four major tributary sites and upstream in the Mississippi River, indicating that when mean daily streamflow during the previous year was lower than average, nitrate concentrations were higher than expected. The strength of these relationships increased when data were subdivided by contemporaneous flow conditions. Five of the eight sites had significant negative relationships (p ≤ 0.05) at high or moderately high contemporaneous flows, suggesting nitrate that accumulates in these basins during a drought is flushed during subsequent high flows. At half of the sites, when mean daily flow during the previous year was 50 percent lower than average, nitrate concentration can be from 9 to 27 percent higher than nitrate concentrations that follow a year with average mean daily flow. Conversely, nitrate concentration can be from 8 to 21 percent lower than expected when flow during the previous year was 50 percent higher than average. Previously documented for small, relatively homogenous basins, our results suggest that relationships between antecedent flows and nitrate concentrations are also observable at a regional scale. Relationships were not observed (using all contemporaneous flow data together) for basins larger than 1 million km2, suggesting that above this limit the overall size and diversity within these basins may necessitate the use of more complicated statistical approaches or that there may be no discernible basin-wide relationship with antecedent flow. The relationships between nitrate concentration and Qratio identified in this study serve as the basis for future studies that can better define specific hydrologic processes occurring during and after a drought (or high flow period) which influence nitrate concentration, such as the duration or magnitude of low flows, and the timing of low and high flows.

Highlights

  • Many studies show that antecedent moisture conditions influence nutrient export from river basins (Burt and Worrall, 2009; Garrett, 2012; Macrae et al, 2010; Soulsby et al, 2003; Vecchia et al, 2008; Lucey and Goolsby, 1993)

  • Most observations concerning the influence of antecedent moisture on nutrient export have been made in small basins with generally homogenous land use, land cover, climate, and geology (e.g., Biron et al, 1999; Burt and Worrall, 2009; Cooper et al, 2007; Foster and Walling, 1978; Lange and Haensler, 2012; Macrae et al, 2010; Welsch et al, 2001), and little attention has been given to how this influence plays

  • Many of the sites in our study, except the Missouri River (HERM), show a negative relationship between antecedent flow conditions and nitrate anomaly when specific contemporaneous flow classes are considered, or when all contemporaneous flows are considered together, suggesting that the influence of antecedent moisture conditions on nitrate export is observable at a large scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many studies show that antecedent moisture conditions influence nutrient export from river basins (Burt and Worrall, 2009; Garrett, 2012; Macrae et al, 2010; Soulsby et al, 2003; Vecchia et al, 2008; Lucey and Goolsby, 1993). Most observations concerning the influence of antecedent moisture on nutrient export have been made in small basins with generally homogenous land use, land cover, climate, and geology (e.g., Biron et al, 1999; Burt and Worrall, 2009; Cooper et al, 2007; Foster and Walling, 1978; Lange and Haensler, 2012; Macrae et al, 2010; Welsch et al, 2001), and little attention has been given to how this influence plays. Wet antecedent conditions may flush nitrate and other nutrients from the basin with more frequency, depleting the availability of these constituents in the soil and causing lower than anticipated concentrations in streamwater

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.