Abstract

Comprehensive information on Antarctic macrobenthic community structure has been publicly available since the 1960s. It stems from trawl, dredge, grab, and corer samples as well as from direct and camera observations (Table 1–2). The quality of this information varies considerably; it consists of pure descriptions, figures for presence (absence) and abundance of some key taxa or proxies for such parameters, e.g. sea-floor cover. Some data sets even cover a defined and complete proportion of the macrobenthos with further analyses on diversity and zoogeography. As a consequence the acquisition of data from approximately 90 different campaigns assembled here was not standardised. Nevertheless, it was possible to classify this broad variety of known macrobenthic assemblages to the best of expert knowledge (Gutt 2007; Fig. 1). This overview does not replace statistically sound community and diversity analyses. However, it shows from where which kind of information is available and it acts as an example of the feasibility and power of such data collections. The data set provides unique georeferenced biological basic information for the planning of future coordinated research activities, e.g. under the umbrella of the biology program “Antarctic Thresholds - Ecosystem Resilience and Adaptation” (AnT-ERA) of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) and especially for actual conservation issues, e.g. the planning of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR).

Highlights

  • Other mobile epifauna assemblages can be dominated in shallow areas by the asteroid Acodontaster validus, by two species of the grazing echinoid Sterechinus, a variety of deposit feeding and scavenging ophiuroids and mobile holothurians

  • Very low biomass and abundances are found in shallow habitats that are physically and permanently disturbed by sea-scour, in intermediately deep shelf areas that are scoured by icebergs and in extremely oligotrophic situations under or close to the ice-shelves

  • Common names: sessile suspension feeders and associated fauna (SSFA), sessile suspension feeders and associated fauna - predator driven (SSFA-PRED), sessile suspension feeders and associated fauna - dominated by sponges (SSFA-SPO), sessile suspension feeders and associated fauna - dominated by taxa other than sponges (SSFA-OTH), mixed assemblage (MIX), very low biomass or absence of trophic guilds (VLB), “monospecific” (MONO), physically controlled (PHYCO), mobile deposit feeders, infauna and grazers (MOIN), mobile deposits feeders, infauna and grazers - infauna dominated (MOIN-INF), mobile deposit feeders, infauna and grazers - epifauna dominated (MOIN-EPI), vent (VENT), and seep (SEEP)

Read more

Summary

Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation

Academic editor: L. Penev | Received 12 December 2012 | Accepted 12 February 2013 | Published 19 February 2013 Citation: Gutt J, Barnes DKA, Lockhart SJ, van de Putte A (2013) Antarctic macrobenthic communities: A compilation of circumpolar information. Nature Conservation 4: 1–13. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.4.4499

Taxonomic coverage
Spatial coverage
Methods
Findings
Dataset description
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call