Abstract

ObjectivesFor appropriate sepsis care, prognostic laboratory markers are mandatory. The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of serum actin, gelsolin and the recently defined actin/gelsolin ratio during sepsis by comparison it to classical clinical and inflammatory laboratory parameters. Design & methodsWe analyzed sera of severe septic (n=32) and SIRS (n=12) patients for 5days. Ophthalmologic patients (n=27) served as controls. Besides serum actin, gelsolin and actin/gelsolin ratios classical laboratory parameters (WBC count, serum procalcitonin, hsCRP) and clinical scores (APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA), were also assessed. ResultsSeptic patients showed significantly decreased first-day gelsolin levels and increased actin/gelsolin ratios compared to SIRS patients (p<0.05), furthermore, non-survivors had significantly lower gelsolin levels compared to survivors (p<0.05). Non-survivors had 11.4-fold higher 2nd day actin/gelsolin ratios than survivors. Besides procalcitonin (PCT) and hsCRP, gelsolin and actin/gelsolin ratios also proved to be useful in discriminating SIRS from sepsis in the ICU (p<0.05). Gelsolin had similar prognostic value to PCT when assessing 7-day mortality and the predictive capacity of the first-day actin/gelsolin ratios was similar to that of APACHE II score regarding ICU mortality in severe sepsis. ConclusionsSerum gelsolin and actin/gelsolin ratio might serve as efficient complementary prognostic markers in sepsis. However, for daily clinical usage, an automated laboratory assay of actin and gelsolin is still needed to be developed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.