Abstract

Previous studies have implicated nitric oxide (NO) in the antinociceptive response to the anesthetic gas nitrous oxide (N 2O). The present study was conducted to confirm this NO involvement using pharmacological and gene knockdown and knockout strategies to inhibit the supraspinal and spinal production of NO. Antinociceptive responsiveness to 70% N 2O was assessed using the acetic acid (0.6%) abdominal constriction test in NIH Swiss mice following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) or intrathecal (i.t.) pretreatment with the NOS-inhibitor l-N G-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (AS-ODN) directed against neuronal NOS (nNOS). Experiments were also conducted in mice homozygous for a defective nNOS gene (nNOS −/−). Mice that were pretreated i.c.v. or i.t. with L-NAME (1.0 µg) both exhibited 80–90% reduction in the magnitude of the N 2O-induced antinociceptive response. Mice that were pretreated i.c.v. or i.t. with nNOS AS-ODN (3 × 25 µg) exhibited a 60–80% antagonism of the antinociceptive response. Compared to wild-type mice, nNOS knockout mice showed a 60% reduction in N 2O-induced antinociception. These findings consistently demonstrate that transient or developmental suppression of nNOS expression significantly reduces antinociceptive responsiveness to N 2O. NO of both supraspinal and spinal origin, therefore, plays an important role in the antinociceptive response to N 2O.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.