Abstract

Credit scoring is a commonly used method for evaluating the risk involved in granting credits. Both Genetic Programming (GP) and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) have been investigated in the past as possible tools for credit scoring. This paper reports an investigation into the relative performances of GP, ACO and a new hybrid GP-ACO approach, which relies on the ACO technique to produce the initial populations for the GP technique. Performance of the hybrid approach has been compared with both the GP and ACO approaches using two well-known benchmark data sets. Experimental results demonstrate the dependence of GP and ACO classification accuracies on the input data set. For any given data set, the hybrid approach performs better than the worse of the other two methods. Results also show that use of ACO in the hybrid approach has only a limited impact in improving GP performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call