Abstract

Considering the dynamics of the fast-changing and often unpredictable global environment, a formal, reliable, and comprehensive framework for analyzing a business’ strategic posture may be useful. This paper examines an assessment tool, Igor Ansoff’s seminal contributions to strategic diagnosis. That tool focuses primarily on identifying and enhancing a firm’s strategic financial performance potential through analysis of an industrial sector environmental turbulence level relative to the firm’s aggressiveness and capability responsiveness. A small business survey conducted in the Henan Province of China after the COVID-19 lock-down analyzes the future strategic financial performance potential of the province’s small businesses as well as the interactions among the businesses’ external environmental turbulence level, aggressiveness, and capability responsiveness.

Highlights

  • This paper is based on a computer research model based on the seminal work of Igor Ansoff

  • Its main innovation is represented by the fact it extends beyond the traditional steps method in the strategic decisionmaking process

  • Even though that is considered critical for determining the future course and optimal strategy of a firm, Ansoff adds that the traditional steps method fails to examine the interrelationship of all the strategic decision-making variables, what he refers as the “firm’s strategic posture”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Even though that is considered critical for determining the future course and optimal strategy of a firm, Ansoff adds that the traditional steps method fails to examine the interrelationship of all the strategic decision-making variables, what he refers as the “firm’s strategic posture”. In 1987, Igor Ansoff developed an interactive computer program for strategic management analysis. The program, ANSPLAN-A, was intended to serve as an internal consulting tool and would include input from line managers who were responsible for strategy implementation [3]. This tool is both a descriptive as well as a prescriptive. Thwaites and Glaister assert that, “to succeed in an industry an organization must select a mode of strategic behavior which matches the levels of environmental turbulence and develop a resource capability which complements the chosen mode” [11]

Questionnaire
Diversity of Competing Marketing Techniques
Alignment and Gaps
Findings
History of Effective Problem Solving

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.