Abstract

Laboratory and field studies have demonstrated the applicability of anoxic/aerial survival as an early warning indicator of contaminant induced stress. The effects of xenobiotics, including heavy metals, organometals and organics as well as contaminated field sediments have been investigated. The use of this physiological response is rapid, easily quantified and inexpensive. In most studies bivalve molluscs were investigated, the sea mussel Mytilus edulis L. being the favourite species. The different approaches used by various researchers, as reported in the literature, demonstrate the necessity for these experiments to be standardized. When estimating the mortality rate in a closed system or by aerial exposure, the cause of death may not be an indication of anoxia tolerance, but may be an artifact due to the development of microorganisms. Therefore the use of a flow-through system is suggested in cases where the duration of a test exceeds 1 week. When the response is used for the acute assessment of water quality a closed system may be used at low temperatures in combination with an organism with a relatively low anoxia tolerance (e.g., crustaceans). Various reasons why anoxic tolerance may be reduced by toxicants are proposed. Depletion of fuel reserves involved in anaerobic metabolism and intoxication by fermentative products may already commence during chronic exposure to contaminants, and/or the anaerobic energy metabolism may be disturbed. In general there is elevated catabolic activity during anoxic exposure, especially pyruvate derivatives are prominent end products in muscle tissue of contaminant exposed groups. comp biochem physiol 113C, 299–312, 1996.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call