Anovel set of Austrian reference unit costs for comprehensive societal perspectives consistent with latest European costing methods for economic evaluations.

Abstract

Decision making in public health often happens against the background of scarce resources. The systematic use of economic evaluations can be amain enabler in the alignment of public health goals with budgetary constraints. However, the lack of standardized methodology in terms of costing method and perspective are acritical barrier to the implementation of economic evaluations and the international comparability of results. We present anovel set of 22reference unit costs (RUCs) optimized for cross-sectoral economic evaluations in Austria suitable for international comparability calculated using the standardized PECUNIA RUC Template. The common framework for costing and reporting, as well as the easy availability of the RUCs will reduce the burden on researchers and policy makers in future economic evaluations. The higher quality, accuracy, transparency and availability of economic evidence for policy design will help to improve the efficiency of public health-relevant healthcare decisions and make it easier for policy makers to bring funding arrangements and decision making across multiple sectors in line with Health-in-All-Policies goals.