Abstract
offices of the German Government in Petrograd. Sisson's commentary on the meaning of the papers spelled it out unequivocally: the Bolsheviks were Germany's paid agents. In the ensuing controversy over the authenticity of the documents, the debaters tended to make judgments according to their political inclinations. The collection was subjected to serious scrutiny only twice: in 1940, by S. Mel'gunov2 and in 1956, by G. Kennan.3 Kennan traced the origins of the different parts of Sisson's purchase, analysed their language and technical aspects, such as lettering, seals, and handwriting, and tested the 68 items for their general and specific historical plausibility. He demonstrated that the papers were not what Sisson had believed them to be and identified the probable forger as Anton Martynovich Ossendowsky.4 He nevertheless concluded: 'It is quite conceivable that the texts published in the pamphlet were based on genuine letters and merely touched up, in certain instances, by the addition of the reference to leading Communist figures'.5 Mel'gunov had previously made a similar assessment. The amount of relevant material published in the past three decades warrants another look at the question. Moreover, the terms in which the problem is often conceived need to be clarified. To prove the existence of ties between Parvus and the Bolsheviks does not mean to establish that Lenin was a German spy. Lenin inadvertently contributed to the longevity of the fallacious latter proposition by protesting equally vehemently against both charges.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.