Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses the derivation of the refractive index structure function. It shows that the traditional formulation, which is based on the hydrostatic assumption, leads to increasing errors with height when compared with a formulation that is based on the potential temperature. The paper corrects a long-standing problem of extrapolating the traditional boundary layer approximation beyond its region of validity (i.e., to the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere). The new derivation may have applications in observational work to measure and seeing and in numerical modeling efforts. A preliminary analysis of the influence of the new formulation in numerical modeling of seeing suggests that impact on seeing will be small in general, because the largest contribution to seeing generally comes from the lower troposphere. However, an accurate profile is needed because other astroclimatic parameters, such as the isoplanatic angle, can suffer from the lack of accuracy at high altitude. This work may also have application in radar meteorology, since clear-air radar sensitivity depends on accurate estimation of .

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.