Abstract
Braver and Braver (1988) promoted a meta-analysis technique as the most powerful single test for analyzing data from a Solomon Four-Group Design. Customary analysis on fabricated data was not significant, but the meta-analysis yielded significance. The current paper counters that fabricated data sets can easily be constructed to show that customary tests can yield significance, whereas the meta-analysis does not. Statements about the efficacy and power of meta-analysis should be made more cautiously.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
