Abstract
Local wisdom has been coexisting with the state system in several places in Indonesia. The Mountain Mutis Nature Reserve in East Nusa Tenggara province is the strict nature reserves, but a customary land tenure system, called suf, exists so far in the nature reserve. The objectives of this study are (1) to organize the historical territorialization process, (2) to clarify the customary land tenure system and activities for livelihoods by local people, and (3) to discuss the challenges of its land tenure system to manage forests sustainably as well as policy methods to harmonize legal pluralism in Mutis Area. Field observation and in-depth interviews with key informants were employed for data collection, and the collected data were analyzed by a qualitative descriptive method. The findings showed the traditional reward and punishment systems regarding extracting non-timber forest products, grazing livestock, and preventing forest fires were working well for sustainable forest management. However, increased pressure on forests due to future population growth appears to have an impact on the traditional system. It also showed the government officers and local people started some discussions to recognize the suf in the formal legal order. However, there were institutional problems to introduce current state systems. Therefore, it is required to flexibly operate or revise the state laws according to the actual situation to harmonize society between state and people.
Highlights
In the colonization era, forest areas were gazetted after the territorial declarations, and those forests were managed based on scientific forestry (Peluso, 1992; Sivaramakrishnan, 1995)
They started discussions to recognize the suf in the formal legal order
The Mountain Mutis area consists of two conservation areas with different state jurisdictions: (1) the Mountain Mutis Protected Forest managed by the Mutis Forest Management Unit under the control of the Provincial Government Forest Service and (2) the Mountain Mutis Nature Reserve that the Dutch government designated initially as the forest covers
Summary
Forest areas were gazetted after the territorial declarations, and those forests were managed based on scientific forestry (Peluso, 1992; Sivaramakrishnan, 1995). Colonial governments designated some forests as protected areas without prior discussion with local communities. Vandergeest & Peluso (2015) term such forests area as a political forest. In Indonesia, in the mid-19th century, the Dutch colonial government was managing the forests to meet the timber needs of the shipbuilding industries (Nurjaya, 2005). After the depletion, several rules were issued to prohibit the cutting of teak trees. The Dutch colonial government conducted forest management with a clear-cutting system and modern silvicultural rules derived from European countries, especially in Germany (i.e., scientific forestry)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
