Abstract
Abstract Ryder's morphoedaphic index (MEI: Total dissolved solids, TDS/mean lake depth) was developed empirically as a predictor of fish yield. It generally accounts for 60 to 78% of the variation (corrected sums of squares) in fish yields observed in a set of data. However, no basis for these correlations has been proven or even generally accepted. We demonstrate that two mundane relationships may be the reasons the MEI appears to be valid. Quite simply, large bodies of water tend to produce greater fish yields than small ones, and large bodies of water tend to have greater mean depths than small ones. Mean depth acts as a surrogate for surface area in the MEI; however, surface area alone is a more powerful predictor. It accounts for 94% of the variation in fish yields observed in three combined sets of data reported in the literature. The variation accounted for by the regression only increased to 95% when TDS was added as a predictor.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
