Anorectal malformation & Hirschsprung’s disease: A cross-sectional comparison of quality of life and bowel function to healthy controls

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) face long-term disturbance in bowel function even after definitive surgery. This study evaluates the quality of life (QOL) of patients with ARM and HD, and compares them to healthy controls using self-report questionnaires. MethodologyA prospective study was performed recruiting patients with ARM or HD from September 2013 to December 2014 who had primary surgery done in our institution at least 2 years prior to participation. Age-matched and gender-matched controls were enrolled from our patients with minor outpatient complaints. All participants completed the following PedsQL™ scales (maximum score 100): 4.0 Generic Core Scales, 3.0 General Well-Being (GWB) Scale and 2.0 Family Impact (FI) Module. All were also scored on bowel function (BFS), with a maximum score 20. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed, with significance level <0.05. ResultsThere were 193 participants: 87 controls, 62 ARM, 44 HD. When comparing Core, GWB and FI scores, there were no significant differences between groups although controls had best scores indicating best QOL and general wellbeing, with least impact of the child’s health on the family. BFS was significantly different with controls having best and ARM worst scores. There were no significant differences in scores between parent and child indicating intradyad consistency. There was significant positive correlation between BFS and Core (p<0.0001), and between BFS and GWB scores (p<0.005); and significant negative correlation between BFS and FI scores (p<0.0001). ConclusionsBowel function impacts quality of life. Those with ARM and HD can achieve good quality of life comparable to controls, based on patient and caregiver self-reported outcomes. Type of studyProspective comparative study Level of evidenceLevel II.