Abstract
Discrepancies in the results obtained during the adsorption of nitrogen, argon, and water on two mesoporous samples are compared and contrasted. A silica-based mesoporous oxide and the same sample coated with a film of polystyrene were chosen with respect to their different surface chemistries. The nitrogen BET surface is overestimated on the pure silica sample and underestimated for the polymer-coated sample. These differences can be related to the specific interaction (strong or weak) of nitrogen with these surfaces. Water has difficulty in wetting either surface. Moreover, in the case of the polymer-coated material, water is unable to fill the mesopores via capillary condensation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
