Abstract

BackgroundSince the inception of DBS, cathodic pulses have been used. ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses on the therapeutic window (TW) in essential tremor (ET) patients. MethodsA randomized, doubled-blinded, cross-over design was used to test the effect of cathodic, anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses (cathode-first and anode-first) on the TW in an acute clinical setting. TW was defined as the difference between the minimal stimulation amplitude provoking side effects and minimal stimulation amplitude inducing tremor arrest. Results9 ET patients (10 hemispheres) were included. Anodic stimulation induced a significantly larger TW compared to cathodic stimulation (p = 0.008). Symmetric biphasic stimulation also widened the TW compared to cathodic stimulation for both cathode- (p = 0.047) and anode-first (p = 0.008) biphasic pulses. For both anodic and biphasic pulses, the effect on TW was mainly driven by the change in side effect threshold. The order of the phases in the biphasic pulse had a significant effect on the side effect threshold (p = 0.039), with biphasic-anode first having the highest value. All pulse shapes were safe in the acute setting. ConclusionAnodic and symmetric biphasic pulses increase TW in ET patients.

Highlights

  • Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurologic disorders [1]

  • We showed that anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses provide a wider therapeutic window (TW) than classical cathodic pulses in an acute setting

  • The wider TW is mostly induced by increasing the side effect threshold

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurologic disorders [1]. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the standard of care for treating medication-refractory ET [2], lesional alternatives exist [3]. Vim-DBS significantly reduces tremor in most patients. Objective: To investigate the effect of anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses on the therapeutic window (TW) in essential tremor (ET) patients. Methods: A randomized, doubled-blinded, cross-over design was used to test the effect of cathodic, anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses (cathode-first and anode-first) on the TW in an acute clinical setting. Anodic stimulation induced a significantly larger TW compared to cathodic stimulation (p 1⁄4 0.008). Symmetric biphasic stimulation widened the TW compared to cathodic stimulation for both cathode- (p 1⁄4 0.047) and anode-first (p 1⁄4 0.008) biphasic pulses. For both anodic and biphasic pulses, the effect on TW was mainly driven by the change in side effect threshold. Conclusion: Anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses increase TW in ET patients

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.