Abstract

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic rehabilitation technique for motor impairment. However, despite extensive investigation into the effects of anodal tDCS on motor output, there is little information on how anodal tDCS affects response processes. In this study, we used a cued go/nogo task with both directional and non-directional cues to assess the effects of anodal tDCS over the dominant (left) primary motor cortex on prepared and unprepared motor responses. Three experiments explored whether the effectiveness of tDCS varied with timing between stimulation and test. Healthy, right-handed young adults participated in a double-blind randomised controlled design with crossover of anodal tDCS and sham stimulation. In Experiment 1, twenty-four healthy young adults received anodal tDCS over dominant M1 at least 40 mins before task performance. In Experiment 2, eight participants received anodal tDCS directly before task performance. In Experiment 3, twenty participants received anodal tDCS during task performance. In all three experiments, participants responded faster to directional compared to non-directional cues and with their right hand. However, anodal tDCS had no effect on go/nogo task performance at any stimulation – test interval. Bayesian analysis confirmed that anodal stimulation had no effect on response speed. We conclude that anodal tDCS over M1 does not improve response speed of prepared or unprepared responses of young adults in a go/nogo task.

Highlights

  • There is a growing body of literature on the potential therapeutic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation across a wide range of physical and mental pathologies.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124509 May 1, 2015Anodal tDCS on Choice Reaction Time

  • We conclude that response preparation and response selection as assessed by a cued go/nogo task are not affected by anodal tDCS over dominant M1 in young adults

  • The finding that, in young adults, dominant hand performance is not enhanced by anodal tDCS over the dominant M1is consistent with the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT) findings by Boggio et al [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a growing body of literature on the potential therapeutic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) across a wide range of physical and mental pathologies. The effect of anodal tDCS over M1 on motor output of hand and leg muscles has been examined in young adults by measuring changes in the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Based on previous findings of increased motor excitability and improved motor sequence and functional motor task performance following stimulation (see [15] for a review), we hypothesised that anodal tDCS would improve performance (i.e. increase response speed and reduce error rate) compared to the sham condition. In Experiment 1, active tDCS stimulation of the dominant (left) motor cortex was expected to improve performance compared to sham stimulation, and the effect was expected to be greater for the right (contralateral) hand. If tDCS improves performance by acting on motor preparation processes, we expected the effect to be greater for directional than non-directional cue conditions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Results and Discussion
General Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call