Abstract
Model-based prediction of annual ring density (RD) is necessary to manage forests for wood quality objectives. However, annual RD in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud.) exhibits a high degree of variability making it a challenge to model. We compared two methods of predicting annual RD including (1) a ring component approach and (2) a direct approach. The former approach uses model-based estimates of earlywood density (EWD), latewood density (LWD) and latewood proportion (LWP) to calculate annual RD. The latter approach uses a single model with annual RD as the dependent variable. The two approaches were tested using a dataset which included sites on the western and eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains, within the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, Canada. The best models for EWD, LWD and LWP included ring number and ring width, while site-specific parameters indicated that sites on the western slopes differed from those on the eastern slopes. Component-based estimates of annual RD using only fixed effects explained 25 per cent of the variability, increasing to 63 per cent with random effects. The best model for a direct estimate of annual RD explained only 5 per cent of the variability using fixed effects, increasing to 55 per cent with random effects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.