Abstract

The importance of geographic location and annual variation on the detection of differences in the rhizomicrobiome caused by the genetic modification of maize (Bt-maize, event MON810) was evaluated at experimental field sites across Europe including Sweden, Denmark, Slovakia and Spain. DNA of the rhizomicrobiome was collected at the maize flowering stage in three consecutive years and analyzed for the abundance and diversity of PCR-amplified structural genes of Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi, and functional genes for bacterial nitrite reductases (nirS, nirK). The nirK genes were always more abundant than nirS. Maize MON810 did not significantly alter the abundance of any microbial genetic marker, except for sporadically detected differences at individual sites and years. In contrast, annual variation between sites was often significant and variable depending on the targeted markers. Distinct, site-specific microbial communities were detected but the sites in Denmark and Sweden were similar to each other. A significant effect of the genetic modification of the plant on the community structure in the rhizosphere was detected among the nirK denitrifiers at the Slovakian site in only one year. However, most nirK sequences with opposite response were from the same or related source organisms suggesting that the transient differences in community structure did not translate to the functional level. Our results show a lack of effect of the genetic modification of maize on the rhizosphere microbiome that would be stable and consistent over multiple years. This demonstrates the importance of considering annual variability in assessing environmental effects of genetically modified crops.

Highlights

  • The cultivation of genetically modified (GM) maize with resistance against agricultural pests has become common practice in many countries across the world [1]

  • Between samples from BT and non-BT maize, there was no significant difference in the abundance of bacterial 16S rRNA genes or in the abundance of nirS genes at any of the sites in any of the sampling years

  • The nirK copy number was higher in the non-BT samples than in the BT samples at the Slovakian site in 2012 and the Swedish site in 2014 (Table 2) but nirK abundance was not influenced by the maize genotype at the sites in Denmark and Spain and at the site in Slovakia in 2013 and 2014, and Sweden in 2012 and 2013

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cultivation of genetically modified (GM) maize with resistance against agricultural pests has become common practice in many countries across the world [1]. DNA sequences are deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under the accession number PRJEB33038

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.