Annual plant functional traits explain shrub facilitation in a desert community

Abstract

AbstractQuestionFor a desert where winter is the driest, harshest season we asked: does the effect of dominant shrubs (Bulnesia retama) on annual species depend on (1) the functional traits of the latter, (2) the season of the year, or (3) the activity of livestock?LocationA low‐density goat farm in central‐northern Monte Desert, Argentina.MethodsWe estimated the effect of shrubs using a log response ratio based on annual species population sizes underneath shrub canopies and in open spaces. We collected density data of annual species in 18 visits between Aug 2010 and Apr 2013 in permanent 50‐cm square areas laid out according to a split‐plot design, in which the activity of livestock (fenced and unfenced; plots were 10‐m squares) was the main factor, and microsite type (shrub and open) was the subordinate factor, with 20 replicates for each combination. We also gathered data on eight functional traits (characterizing whole plants, leaves, roots and seeds) from annual plants collected in the study site following standardized protocols.ResultsAnnual species with acquisitive attributes (high specific leaf area, intermediate‐to‐low leaf dry matter content, large leaves and high specific root volume) were more benefited by shrubs compared to species with the opposite, relatively conservative attributes. Facilitative influences of shrubs were pervasive during winter, while competitive influences increased in frequency during summer, when total plant density was higher. This pattern was not affected by livestock.ConclusionsThe outcome of species interactions depended on the interplay between plant strategies and abiotic stress: facilitated species were mostly acquisitive, and shrub facilitation was more important during the harshest season (winter). Specific root volume, along with widely used functional traits (specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, leaf size) delineated such strategies. This underlines the importance of considering below‐ground traits when studying plant–plant interactions. Single traits achieved superior explanatory power of shrub effects than composite ones (i.e. principal component axes based on single traits), reinforcing the idea that single functional traits are themselves meaningful indicators of complex physiological trade‐offs that ultimately affect community structure and dynamics.