Abstract

This paper presents the issues of assessing the comfort of people staying indoors who are exposed to vibrations and material noise caused by vibrations of partitions like floors and walls (ground-borne noise). Current criteria in the evaluation of vibrational and acoustic comfort cannot be assessed in the context of the simultaneous occurrence of stimuli such as noise and vibration. Railway transport, including passenger and cargo transport, is becoming increasingly prevalent, and new railway lines are being planned for environmental reasons. Sometimes, there are changes in stimuli produced by existing railway lines. For example, high-speed trains appear on an old railway track. Such a situation appeared on the Central Railway Line in Poland, which is still used by old trains, yet its operator plans to raise their speed limits. The analysis of the problem of the simultaneous occurrence of stimuli presented in this paper was based on measurements performed in a residential building located near the Central Railway Main Line in the city Zawiercie. Noise and vibration as the analyzed stimuli in both cases meet comfort requirements, yet when exposure to two stimuli was considered, comfort may be at risk.

Highlights

  • Sustainable indoor comfort is generally understood as thermal comfort with aspects of humidity comfort, sometimes with air quality as well

  • The work presented in [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] provides the basis to create novel approach to quantitative comfort evaluation presented in this paper

  • The question stated in this paper is can considering two stimuli together significantly increase the annoyance under assessment in relation to evaluating the relevant stimuli independently?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainable indoor comfort is generally understood as thermal comfort with aspects of humidity comfort, sometimes with air quality as well. Despite the directive [3], both stimuli noise and vibration are not combined together in the context of sustainable indoor comfort. There has been an observable a trend to connect these factors into one vibro-acoustic stimulus [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. This appears to be a good direction, because, in most cases when vibration appears, noise appears as well [21]. The novel element proposed in this paper is an evaluation of comfort using total annoyance from noise and vibration combined. The question stated in this paper is can considering two stimuli together significantly increase the annoyance under assessment in relation to evaluating the relevant stimuli independently?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call