Abstract
Empirical research has not generally supported the hypothesis that announcements of related mergers benefit stockholders more than announcements of unrelated mergers. This study uses a new categorization methodology to identify mergers with and without strategic fits. Purely related and purely unrelated mergers occurring between 1972 and 1990 are identified using a combination of objective and subjective categorization methods. Results support the hypothesis that purely related acquirers benefit more than purely unrelated acquirers. Acquiring firm stockholder returns were also higher if the acquisition was friendly or a tender offer. The results did not suggest that acquired firms' shareholders benefit more in purely related acquisitions than in purely unrelated acquisitions. Acquired firms’ stockholder returns were higher if the transaction was a tender offer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
