Abstract
State practice shows that in the context of unification and integration of States, the principle of succession to international responsibility finds application. The examination of State practice and case law in the context of Newly Independent States shows a great variety of solutions supporting both the principles of succession and non-succession to international responsibility. Several specific circumstances have been identified under which State practice and case law (as well as doctrine) support the application of the principle of succession, whereby the successor State takes over the obligations arising from internationally wrongful acts committed by the predecessor State before the date of succession. State practice and case law in the context of State succession to the right to reparation is much more straightforward than the issue of succession to the obligation to repair.Keywords: case law; international responsibility; internationally wrongful act; Newly Independent States; predecessor State; State practice; successor State
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
