Análisis de los costes y la efectividad del uso de cilostazol frente a naftidrofurilo y pentoxifilina en el tratamiento de la claudicación intermitente en España

Abstract

Introduction Cilostazol is a reversible selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase III which has platelet antiaggregating and vasodilatory activity. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical and economic consequences of the use of cilostazol compared with naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline in the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC) in Spain. Methods A pharmacoeconomic model was built based on the literature to describe the management of IC and its clinical and economic consequences for each treatment option evaluated in patients 40 years or older with a medical history of symptomatic IC secondary to peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities. Clinical results were obtained from a review of clinical trials of the comparators. Spanish unit costs were used to measure the economic consequences associated with the use of healthcare resources based on a similar study performed in the UK. Results Starting treatment with cilostazol instead of pentoxifylline would increase the maximum distance covered by 72%, reducing costs by 11.5%. Compared with naftidrofuryl, cilostazol was associated with an increase in effectiveness of 34% and an increase in healthcare costs of 11.2%. These results mean that cilostazol, naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline would have a cost, per one percentage point increase of the maximum distance covered, of € 7.8, € 9.1 and € 14.7, respectively. Conclusions The study results demonstrate that starting treatment with cilostazol has a more favourable cost-effectiveness ratio compared to other treatments for IC in Spain.