Abstract

Introduction: The clinical evaluation of medical devices is an important component in the evaluation of new technologies for sanitary registration purposes within the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency and represents an important tool for regulatory decision-making to verify compliance with regulations that establish the need for proof of safety and efficacy of medical devices to perform sanitary registration. Objective: To evaluate and discuss the reasons for the rejection of registration requests motivated by deficiencies related to the clinical evaluation of high-risk medical devices. Methods: In the electronic system Datavisa, internal system for storage and analysis of data submitted to Anvisa, all the rejections occurred in 2017 within the scope of the General Office of Medical Devices (GGTPS) concerning the clinical evaluation of medical devices of risk class III and IV, both in the original cause of the refusal and related to the non-compliance with the legally established deadlines for meeting the requirements when at least one of the requirements involved clinical evaluation, were evaluated. Results: Data were collected from the expert opinion of the agency to construct the outline of the main characteristics related to the rejections in relation to the clinical evaluation offered in the registration dossiers by the companies responsible for the submission. The evaluations were divided according to the area responsible for the registry, involving implantable orthopedic materials submitted to the analysis of the Coordination of Implantable Materials in Orthopedics (CMIOR), materials for health use submitted to the analysis of the Office of Materials for Health Use (Gemat) and equipment submitted to the analysis of the Office of Equipment Technology (GQUIP) of Anvisa. Conclusions: Considering the sample of rejected health records, the findings suggest a heterogeneity in both the quality and the format of the data provided in clinical evaluations by companies submitting applications of medical devices, especially related to the methodological nature of the clinical trials presented, deficiencies in risk management, and other regulatory requirements connected to the clinical assessment scenario of medical devices and compliance with minimum design requirements.

Highlights

  • The clinical evaluation of medical devices is an important component in the evaluation of new technologies

  • verify compliance with regulations that establish the need for proof of safety and efficacy

  • discuss the reasons for the rejection of registration requests motivated by deficiencies related to the clinical evaluation

Read more

Summary

Alessandro Ferreira do Nascimento*

Gerência-Geral de Produtos para Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), Brasília, DF, Brasil * E-mail: alessandro.ferreira@anvisa. gov.br Recebido: 09 nov 2019 Aprovado: 06 maio 2019. Método: Foram avaliados no sistema eletrônico Datavisa, sistema interno para armazenamento e análise de dados de processos submetidos à Anvisa, todos os indeferimentos ocorridos em 2017 no âmbito da Gerência-Geral de Tecnologia de Produtos para Saúde (GGTPS), que tiveram como causa aspectos relativos à avaliação clínica de dispositivos médicos de classe de risco III e IV, tanto na causa original do indeferimento, quanto relacionadas ao não cumprimento dos prazos legalmente estabelecidos para o cumprimento das exigências quando pelo menos uma das exigências envolvia a avaliação clínica. Conclusões: Considerando a amostra de indeferimentos de registro sanitário estudada, os achados sugerem uma heterogeneidade tanto na qualidade quanto no formato dos dados fornecidos em avaliações clínicas pelas empresas que submetem registros sanitários de dispositivos médicos, especialmente relacionado à natureza metodológica dos ensaios clínicos apresentados, deficiências no gerenciamento de risco e demais requisitos regulatórios relacionados ao cenário da avaliação clínica de dispositivos médicos e conformidade com os requisitos mínimos do projeto. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Dispositivos Médicos; Avaliação Clínica; Registro Sanitário; Anvisa; Ensaios Clínicos

Nascimento AF Impacto da avaliação clínica no registro de dispositivos médicos
Produtos para diagnóstico in vitro
RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO
Total da Área
Dispositivo de embolização artificial
Lentes intraoculares
Stent farmacológico para artérias coronárias
Tubo de ventilação timpânica Gel hidrolítico desbridante
Prótese total do quadril
Link para acesso
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.