Abstract
At 3K the calculated change in the resistivity obtained by Hayman and Carbotte (see ibid., vol.2, p.915 (1972)) using Ziman's one-iteration approximation (1961) to the solution of the linearised Boltzmann equation is three times as large as that obtained by Ekin and Bringer (see Phys. Rev. B., vol.7, p.4468 (1973)) using the variational technique with a rather simple trial function. In an attempt to resolve the discrepancy between two widely used techniques, the Boltzmann equation was iterated to convergence to determine accurately the anisotropic relaxation time tau (k) as a function of position on the Fermi surface. It was found that the variational result for tau (k) is in good agreement with the accurate one except on those parts of the Fermi surface that are least heavily weighted in a calculation of the electrical resistivity; on the other hand, the Ziman one-iteration solution is much too anisotropic, at least for the temperature range considered. The electrical resistivity calculated with the accurately determined anisotropic relaxation times is only marginally better than the variational result. The same applies to the effective number of carriers in the Hall effect.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.