Abstract
The applicability of various density functional theory (DFT) methods to describe the anisotropy of the intermolecular potential energy surfaces of hydrogen-bonded [OH−–H2O, (H2O)2] and van der Waals [CO–H2O, He–CO2] complexes has been tested by comparison with supermolecule CCSD(T) (coupled-cluster method restricted to single, double, and noniterative triple excitations) and perturbational SAPT (symmetry-adapted perturbation theory) results computed for the same geometries and with the same basis sets. It is shown that for strongly bound ionic hydrogen-bonded complexes, like OH−–H2O, hybrid approaches provide accurate results. For other systems, including the water dimer, the DFT calculations fail to reproduce the correct angular dependence of the potential surfaces. It is also shown that a hybrid functional adjusted to reproduce the CCSD(T) value of the binding energy for the water dimer produces results worse than the standard hybrid functionals for OH−–H2O, and fails to describe the correct anisotropy of the CO–H2O interaction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.