Abstract

The electrochemical response of capacitive deionization (CDI) employing a single anion exchange membrane (AEM-CDI) is contrasted to conventional two-membrane CDI (MCDI) formed with complementary anion and cation exchange membranes. Pristine activated carbon cloth electrodes that possess native positive surface charge in solution were used as both anode (positive electrode) and cathode (negative electrode) in these cells. In a separate set of tests to investigate the impact of surface charge modification on deionization responses, the single and dual membrane cells were formed with asymmetric electrodes (AEM-aCDI and aMCDI) consisting of nitric acid oxidized electrodes that possess negative surface charge as the cathode material, while pristine carbon cloth was retained as the anode material. Operating at 1.2 V, salt adsorption capacities are ∼1.3, 9.9, and 16.6, and 17.3 mg NaCl g−1 electrode for the AEM-CDI, MCDI, AEM-aCDI, and aMCDI, respectively. The diminished performance of AEM-CDI is attributed to charge expulsion and enhanced parasitic electrochemical reactions at the unprotected cathode that reduce the charge efficiency. In contrast, for AEM-aCDI, a treated cathode enhances surface charge effects to match aMCDI performance with half the membrane requirement.

Highlights

  • Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you

  • Unlike ED, which relies on electrochemical reactions and field-driven charge diffusion facilitated by large potentials, Membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) electrostatically stores ions in electrical double-layers (EDLs) formed in highly porous electrically conductive materials, typically made of carbon (Fig. 1a)

  • Previous works have already examined the performance of deionization cells configured with single cation exchange membranes showing increases in the amount of salt stored in comparison to a capacitive deionization (CDI) cell,[11,13,14,15] and we observe sorption capacity on par with MCDI (Fig. S1)

Read more

Summary

See next page for additional authors

Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, and the Power and Energy Commons

Repository Citation
Results and Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.