Abstract
Fictionalized and dramatized portrayals of science tend to focus misleadingly on breakthroughs, positives, and eureka moments. In the real laboratory, however, negatives can be just as influential. I recall several occasions over the years when failures have spawned considerable success. One was the story, told to me by a respiratory virologist, whose frustrating inability to recover an expected pathogen from pathological specimens triggered a lengthy but eventually successful search for the real cause of a particular condition. Another researcher used to delight student audiences with a parallel story from the world of marine ecosystems. There is also still a substantial argument that meta-analyses in some areas of medical research are disproportionately weighted in favour of positive results when investigators do not report negative findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.